1
00:00:09,799 --> 00:00:08,360
hi everyone this is alex karras from

2
00:00:11,360 --> 00:00:09,809
skeptical comm and i want to let you

3
00:00:13,850 --> 00:00:11,370
know that i just published this

4
00:00:16,039 --> 00:00:13,860
interview with remote viewer paul smith

5
00:00:17,840 --> 00:00:16,049
and there's a couple points in there

6
00:00:20,450 --> 00:00:17,850
that i think are gonna be of interest to

7
00:00:23,480 --> 00:00:20,460
people who follow parapsychology and in

8
00:00:25,009 --> 00:00:23,490
particular remote viewing ayat now if

9
00:00:27,439 --> 00:00:25,019
you don't know and i'm sure you probably

10
00:00:30,529 --> 00:00:27,449
do but paul smith is the real deal

11
00:00:33,020 --> 00:00:30,539
former army intelligence officer one of

12
00:00:35,180 --> 00:00:33,030
the original people the Stargate super

13
00:00:37,160 --> 00:00:35,190
secret program that the military was

14
00:00:38,930 --> 00:00:37,170
running he's published this book he's

15
00:00:41,180 --> 00:00:38,940
published another new one that we

16
00:00:43,369 --> 00:00:41,190
interviewed about on the show practical

17
00:00:45,950 --> 00:00:43,379
guard practical guide to remote viewing

18
00:00:48,440 --> 00:00:45,960
but what I thought would catch the

19
00:00:52,459 --> 00:00:48,450
interest of a lot of folks out there is

20
00:00:54,920 --> 00:00:52,469
I asked him about this that is the

21
00:01:00,349 --> 00:00:54,930
recent remote viewing session that

22
00:01:02,270 --> 00:01:00,359
Courtney Brown did on 9/11 so it's quite

23
00:01:08,390 --> 00:01:02,280
interesting what he had to say give a

24
00:01:10,789 --> 00:01:08,400
listen here it is ereference in the book

25
00:01:13,460 --> 00:01:10,799
Courtney brown who's another remote

26
00:01:16,070 --> 00:01:13,470
viewer came on later in the in the

27
00:01:17,510 --> 00:01:16,080
project Courtney brown under his

28
00:01:21,440 --> 00:01:17,520
organization called the Farsight

29
00:01:24,890 --> 00:01:21,450
Institute recently released an extensive

30
00:01:27,830 --> 00:01:24,900
remote viewing of the 9/11 events and

31
00:01:29,270 --> 00:01:27,840
came to the conclusion that the kind of

32
00:01:33,050 --> 00:01:29,280
keep it short that it was an inside job

33
00:01:36,560 --> 00:01:33,060
that it was not as it's told to us and

34
00:01:39,109 --> 00:01:36,570
that there were other people involved at

35
00:01:43,370 --> 00:01:39,119
either an intelligence level outside the

36
00:01:45,649 --> 00:01:43,380
United States or at some other agency

37
00:01:47,960 --> 00:01:45,659
but that it wasn't as it has been

38
00:01:50,030 --> 00:01:47,970
portrayed to people I guess there's a

39
00:01:53,539 --> 00:01:50,040
bunch of questions about that one have

40
00:01:56,990 --> 00:01:53,549
you remote viewed 9/11 and can you

41
00:01:58,730 --> 00:01:57,000
confirm or deny anything that Courtney

42
00:01:59,230 --> 00:01:58,740
Brown found out I guess I'll just start

43
00:02:03,980 --> 00:01:59,240
with that

44
00:02:05,359 --> 00:02:03,990
okay so 9/11 is something I keep trying

45
00:02:08,210 --> 00:02:05,369
to avoid and still getting fight

46
00:02:09,800 --> 00:02:08,220
specimens first thing I want me clear

47
00:02:11,900 --> 00:02:09,810
Kody Brown actually was never in the

48
00:02:13,500 --> 00:02:11,910
military program he came along later in

49
00:02:18,479 --> 00:02:13,510
the remote unit history

50
00:02:21,330 --> 00:02:18,489
in terms of his project on 9/11 I really

51
00:02:24,119 --> 00:02:21,340
don't trust the data there or at least

52
00:02:26,759 --> 00:02:24,129
the conclusions right first off I don't

53
00:02:28,920 --> 00:02:26,769
see any real reason for thinking that

54
00:02:30,660 --> 00:02:28,930
9/11 happened in the other way than the

55
00:02:33,809 --> 00:02:30,670
official report is people think I'm

56
00:02:35,640 --> 00:02:33,819
naive in that but if you if you look at

57
00:02:36,210 --> 00:02:35,650
the conspiracy theory ideas are they're

58
00:02:37,680 --> 00:02:36,220
crazy

59
00:02:41,270 --> 00:02:37,690
I mean the idea that the building was

60
00:02:43,710 --> 00:02:41,280
imploded it's just ridiculous in a way

61
00:02:46,050 --> 00:02:43,720
what you've done is what I run into all

62
00:02:47,610 --> 00:02:46,060
the time is and what you suggested at

63
00:02:49,770 --> 00:02:47,620
the beginning of the show is the problem

64
00:02:51,660 --> 00:02:49,780
that the the reductionist run into it's

65
00:02:53,400 --> 00:02:51,670
like okay how did it happen how did it

66
00:02:55,920 --> 00:02:53,410
happen how did it happen no I don't have

67
00:03:01,229 --> 00:02:55,930
to say how it happened all's I have to

68
00:03:02,880 --> 00:03:01,239
do is falsify the existing theory well

69
00:03:04,860 --> 00:03:02,890
they can just stick to the evidence and

70
00:03:06,900 --> 00:03:04,870
look at building seven and building

71
00:03:09,809 --> 00:03:06,910
seven who has that has nothing more than

72
00:03:12,119 --> 00:03:09,819
couch fires is a forty seven story steel

73
00:03:14,460 --> 00:03:12,129
frame building that collapses into its

74
00:03:16,650 --> 00:03:14,470
own frame there is no explanation for

75
00:03:18,990 --> 00:03:16,660
that but more importantly we can just

76
00:03:22,289 --> 00:03:19,000
look at the investigation because like

77
00:03:26,819 --> 00:03:22,299
so many things it's not the crime it's

78
00:03:28,890 --> 00:03:26,829
the cover-up that reveals all you can

79
00:03:31,500 --> 00:03:28,900
mess up a remote viewing project by

80
00:03:35,250 --> 00:03:31,510
having a theory to begin with it you

81
00:03:37,229 --> 00:03:35,260
know a and agenda so to speak right you

82
00:03:40,710 --> 00:03:37,239
start off with a certain theory about

83
00:03:43,199 --> 00:03:40,720
what happened now Courtney brown says he

84
00:03:45,089 --> 00:03:43,209
didn't have it didn't have a

85
00:03:47,490 --> 00:03:45,099
preconceived notion about I'm not sure

86
00:03:50,129 --> 00:03:47,500
that's true but whatever the problem is

87
00:03:53,129 --> 00:03:50,139
it comes out in the analysis

88
00:03:55,199 --> 00:03:53,139
you know I normally don't like to talk

89
00:03:57,710 --> 00:03:55,209
about other reviewers in public in a

90
00:04:00,089 --> 00:03:57,720
negative terms but I was at the

91
00:04:02,220 --> 00:04:00,099
conference of Society for scientific

92
00:04:04,319 --> 00:04:02,230
exploration where Courtney Brown got up

93
00:04:06,210 --> 00:04:04,329
on the stand and said he did research

94
00:04:09,240 --> 00:04:06,220
that showed that by November of I think

95
00:04:12,420 --> 00:04:09,250
was 2009 2011 something like that that

96
00:04:14,099 --> 00:04:12,430
the San Francisco earthquake air airport

97
00:04:16,199 --> 00:04:14,109
would be destroyed by an earthquake

98
00:04:18,330 --> 00:04:16,209
right he got up on the stand claim his

99
00:04:20,069 --> 00:04:18,340
remote view and showed that as we all

100
00:04:24,010 --> 00:04:20,079
know San Francisco Airport is still

101
00:04:27,999 --> 00:04:25,330
actually have some pretty decent remote

102
00:04:31,089 --> 00:04:28,009
viewers working but I don't think that

103
00:04:32,649 --> 00:04:31,099
their results necessarily consistently

104
00:04:35,230 --> 00:04:32,659
show what Courtney Brown thinks they do

105
00:04:38,080 --> 00:04:35,240
have you seen their results they're

106
00:04:40,809 --> 00:04:38,090
unedited video tape of their results and

107
00:04:43,719 --> 00:04:40,819
I I don't know that anyone could really

108
00:04:45,550 --> 00:04:43,729
look at their remote viewing and come to

109
00:04:46,149 --> 00:04:45,560
a different conclusion it's pretty cut

110
00:04:47,980 --> 00:04:46,159
and dried

111
00:04:50,350 --> 00:04:47,990
I will admit I haven't watched the

112
00:04:51,939 --> 00:04:50,360
videos on these so I've seen other work

113
00:04:54,339 --> 00:04:51,949
that his folks have done and they do

114
00:04:55,869 --> 00:04:54,349
pretty decent remote viewing but then he

115
00:04:58,719 --> 00:04:55,879
comes to a different conclusion that I

116
00:05:00,520 --> 00:04:58,729
would so we also talked about a number

117
00:05:02,499 --> 00:05:00,530
of other things regarding rote viewing

118
00:05:04,529 --> 00:05:02,509
whether there was possibly an overlay

119
00:05:07,749 --> 00:05:04,539
whether that was a problem whether

120
00:05:10,899 --> 00:05:07,759
Courtney's claimed that he had to block

121
00:05:13,149 --> 00:05:10,909
an intercept of the remote viewing was

122
00:05:15,010 --> 00:05:13,159
possible and you can only imagine what

123
00:05:16,839 --> 00:05:15,020
dr. Smith had to say about that bunch of

124
00:05:18,580 --> 00:05:16,849
other stuff including his remote viewing

125
00:05:20,950 --> 00:05:18,590
of a UFO although he's still very

126
00:05:22,149 --> 00:05:20,960
suspicious and skeptical of that a lot

127
00:05:24,279 --> 00:05:22,159
of good stuff you might want to check

128
00:05:25,719 --> 00:05:24,289
out for the full interview go to

129
00:05:27,939 --> 00:05:25,729
skeptical comm it's free to download

130
00:05:29,800 --> 00:05:27,949
listen to it iTunes stitcher whatever

131
00:05:32,890 --> 00:05:29,810
you want all that stuff is obviously

132
00:05:34,930 --> 00:05:32,900
available you'll get it right there and

133
00:05:36,249 --> 00:05:34,940
then I have a number of other interviews

134
00:05:39,070 --> 00:05:36,259
on remote viewing if you haven't seen

135
00:05:43,620 --> 00:05:39,080
before Paul Smith Oh Stephen Schwartz a

136
00:05:46,120 --> 00:05:43,630
while back Jon Ronson and where is

137
00:05:48,969 --> 00:05:46,130
geomechanical is always really great

138
00:05:50,980 --> 00:05:48,979
stuff so all that's there as well but in

139
00:05:53,499 --> 00:05:50,990
particular I thought you would want to

140
00:05:55,269 --> 00:05:53,509
know about this 911 remote viewing

141
00:05:57,640 --> 00:05:55,279
because it caught my attention it was

142
00:06:00,490 --> 00:05:57,650
interesting to hear what Paul had to say

143
00:06:05,399 --> 00:06:00,500
about it so there you go hope you enjoy